{"id":10281,"date":"2023-04-02T12:27:40","date_gmt":"2023-04-02T11:27:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/event\/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-5\/2023-03-27\/"},"modified":"2023-04-02T12:27:40","modified_gmt":"2023-04-02T11:27:40","slug":"metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-4-2","status":"publish","type":"tribe_events","link":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/event\/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-4-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Metaphysics and Logic Seminar Justin Clarke Doane (Columbia University)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Title: <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">What is Logical Monism?<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Abstract:<\/p>\n<p>Logical monism is the view that there is \u2018One True Logic\u2019. This is the default position, against which pluralists react. If there were not \u2018One True Logic\u2019, it is hard to see how there could be one true theory of anything.\u00a0 A theory is closed under a logic!\u00a0 But what is logical monism? In this article, I consider semantic, logical, modal, scientific, and metaphysical proposals. I argue that, on no \u2018factualist\u2019 analysis (according to which \u2018there is One True Logic\u2019 expresses a factual claim, rather than an attitude like approval), does the doctrine have both metaphysical and methodological import. Metaphysically, logics abound. Methodologically, what to infer from what is not settled by the facts, even the normative ones. I conclude that the only interesting sense in which there could be One True Logic is noncognitive. The same may be true of monism about normative areas, like moral, epistemic, and prudential ones, generally.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Title: What is Logical Monism? Abstract: Logical monism is the view that there is \u2018One True Logic\u2019. This is the default position, against which pluralists&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_tribe_events_status":"","_tribe_events_status_reason":"","_tribe_events_is_hybrid":"","_tribe_events_is_virtual":"","_tribe_events_virtual_video_source":"","_tribe_events_virtual_embed_video":"","_tribe_events_virtual_linked_button_text":"","_tribe_events_virtual_linked_button":"","_tribe_events_virtual_show_embed_at":"","_tribe_events_virtual_show_embed_to":[],"_tribe_events_virtual_show_on_event":"","_tribe_events_virtual_show_on_views":"","_tribe_events_virtual_url":"","footnotes":"","_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"tags":[],"tribe_events_cat":[47],"class_list":["post-10281","tribe_events","type-tribe_events","status-publish","hentry","tribe_events_cat-metaphysics-and-logic-group","cat_metaphysics-and-logic-group"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events\/10281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/tribe_events"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events\/10281\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10283,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events\/10281\/revisions\/10283"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10281"},{"taxonomy":"tribe_events_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events_cat?post=10281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}