  {"id":10478,"date":"2023-05-31T15:48:47","date_gmt":"2023-05-31T14:48:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/event\/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-5\/"},"modified":"2023-05-31T15:48:47","modified_gmt":"2023-05-31T14:48:47","slug":"metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-4-9","status":"publish","type":"tribe_events","link":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/event\/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-4-9\/","title":{"rendered":"Metaphysics and Logic Seminar Frederik Andersen (University of 58³Ô¹Ï)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Title: <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">Burning Bridges? Rationality&#8217;s Fixpoint and Disagreements about Logic\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Abstract: This draft has two main components. First, it clarifies and discusses Michael G. Titelbaum\u2019s controversial\u00a0<em>Fixed Point Thesis<\/em>, which is a theme in several debates of contemporary epistemology including the debates on peer disagreement, epistemic akrasia, and higher-order evidence. Second, it relates the initial discussion of Titelbaum\u2019s thesis to the topic of\u00a0<em>Logical Disagreement<\/em>\u00a0in general and disagreements concerning bridge principles in particular. Eventually it\u2019s argued that the epistemological repercussions of accepting the Fixed Point Thesis are so severe that the thesis must be rejected even if this means that states of epistemic akrasia can sometimes be rational<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Title: Burning Bridges? Rationality&#8217;s Fixpoint and Disagreements about Logic\u00a0 Abstract: This draft has two main components. First, it clarifies and discusses Michael G. Titelbaum\u2019s controversial\u00a0Fixed&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_tribe_events_status":"","_tribe_events_status_reason":"","_tribe_events_is_hybrid":"","_tribe_events_is_virtual":"","_tribe_events_virtual_video_source":"","_tribe_events_virtual_embed_video":"","_tribe_events_virtual_linked_button_text":"","_tribe_events_virtual_linked_button":"","_tribe_events_virtual_show_embed_at":"","_tribe_events_virtual_show_embed_to":[],"_tribe_events_virtual_show_on_event":"","_tribe_events_virtual_show_on_views":"","_tribe_events_virtual_url":"","footnotes":"","_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"tags":[],"tribe_events_cat":[47],"class_list":["post-10478","tribe_events","type-tribe_events","status-publish","hentry","tribe_events_cat-metaphysics-and-logic-group","cat_metaphysics-and-logic-group"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events\/10478","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/tribe_events"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events\/10478\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10479,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events\/10478\/revisions\/10479"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10478"},{"taxonomy":"tribe_events_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/arche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events_cat?post=10478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}