BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.16.4.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Philosophy events
X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20190331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20191027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20200602T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20200602T140000
DTSTAMP:20200602T235922Z
CREATED:20200528T093546Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200602T235922Z
UID:10000953-1591099200-1591106400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind Seminar: L&M Discussion of Derek Ball’s “Definition and Dispute”
DESCRIPTION:During the next three weeks\, we will discuss material from Derek Ball’s book manuscript. \nAbstract: These are two introductory chapters from a book manuscript I’m working on\, entitled Definition and Dispute.  The first chapter introduces some main themes of the book\, and the second develops the leading idea: that the best way of making sense of a wide range of disputes\, including many philosophical disputes\, is to adopt a view on which the meanings of our words (and the contents of our thoughts) are determined in the course of inquiry\, but without change of meaning\, so that our views at the end of an inquiry play a role in determining what we meant all along.  Chapter 2 defends the view by criticising a prominent alternative — the idea that such disputes are matters of “metalinguistic negotiation” — and developing a view of definition that makes sense of what is at issue in these disputes and how we argue. \n  \nThe seminar will happen in Zoom. If you want to join this session\, please e-mail me at si24@.
URL:/philevents/event/language-and-mind-seminar-10/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, 58�Թ�\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20200602T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20200602T150000
DTSTAMP:20200603T001349Z
CREATED:20200515T184857Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200603T001349Z
UID:10000937-1591106400-1591110000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Moral Philosophy Reading Group
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/moral-philosophy-reading-group-3/
LOCATION:Microsoft Teams
CATEGORIES:CEPPA
ORGANIZER;CN="Joe Bowen":MAILTO:jb324@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20200602T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20200602T170000
DTSTAMP:20200602T235922Z
CREATED:20200528T093549Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200602T235922Z
UID:10000954-1591110000-1591117200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Conceptual Engineering Seminar | Gillian Russell (UNC Chapel Hill/58�Թ�): “On a proposed counter-example to Hume’s Law based on Ought Implies Can”
DESCRIPTION:Abstract. — This paper looks at a potential counter-example to Hume’s Law based on the principle that Ought implies Can and especially evaluates (and rejects) a conventionalist view according to which there are oughts that imply can\, and oughts that don’t\, and this makes the question of whether or not Ought implies Can essentially conventional and up to us to decide as we like. \n 
URL:/philevents/event/conceptual-engineering-seminar-gillian-russell-unc-chapel-hill-st-andrews-on-a-proposed-counter-example-to-humes-law-based-on-ought-implies-can/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, 58�Թ�\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Conceptual Engineering Seminar
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR