BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.16.5//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20190331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20191027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20200615
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20200617
DTSTAMP:20200506T082325Z
CREATED:20200417T044325Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200506T082325Z
UID:10000927-1592179200-1592351999@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemic Breakthroughs Workshop
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/epistemic-breakthroughs-workshop-2/
LOCATION:Parliament Hall\, South Street\, 58³Ô¹Ï\, Fife\, KY169AH
CATEGORIES:CEPPA,CEPPA Workshop
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:/philevents/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/EpistemicBreakthroughs-e1569843118647-jl2a94.tmp_.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20200615T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20200615T170000
DTSTAMP:20200615T234353Z
CREATED:20200528T093552Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200615T234353Z
UID:10000964-1592233200-1592240400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics & Logic Seminar Frederick Andersen Title: An Argument Against Justification Holism in the Epistemology of Logic
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: E-sentences (entailment-sentences) are metalinguistic sentences like [A –> B\, A /= B]\, [/= ¬(A & ¬A)]\, and [(A & ¬A) /= B]. This type of sentences is found at the heart of the epistemology of logic as their truth-values tell us what follows from what. Justification holism says that beliefs regarding E-sentences can only be justified in the context of a logical theory\, e.g. classical\, intuitionistic\, paraconsistent etc. Thus\, beliefs concerning E-sentences cannot be atomistically justified as isolated claims about logical consequence\, independently of theory choice. At present there is a developing interest in and endorsement of justification holism due to the revival of a broadly abductivist approach to the epistemology of logic. This paper presents an argument against holism by proving the existence of a foundational E-sentence which is justified independently of theory choice\, i.e. a justificational fixpoint of deductive entailment.
URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-logic-seminar-10/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, 58³Ô¹Ï\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics Reading Group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20200615T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20200615T170000
DTSTAMP:20200615T143753Z
CREATED:20200528T093552Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200615T143753Z
UID:10000965-1592233200-1592240400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar/
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR