BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.16.4.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H X-Robots-Tag:noindex X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/London BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0000 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:BST DTSTART:20190331T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0000 TZNAME:GMT DTSTART:20191027T010000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0000 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:BST DTSTART:20200329T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0000 TZNAME:GMT DTSTART:20201025T010000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0000 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:BST DTSTART:20210328T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0000 TZNAME:GMT DTSTART:20211031T010000 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20201208T120000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20201208T140000 DTSTAMP:20201208T173013Z CREATED:20200819T112951Z LAST-MODIFIED:20201208T173013Z UID:10001092-1607428800-1607436000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Language and Mind Seminar | Lixiao Lin DESCRIPTION: URL:/philevents/event/language-and-mind-seminar-27/ LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, 58³Ô¹Ï\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20201208T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20201208T170000 DTSTAMP:20201208T173013Z CREATED:20200819T112952Z LAST-MODIFIED:20201208T173013Z UID:10001093-1607439600-1607446800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Conceptual Engineering Seminar | Hans-Johann Glock (Zurich): “Conceptual engineering and conceptual analysis: Some conceptual connections†DESCRIPTION:Abstract. — Conceptual engineering is often presented as radically opposed and as superseding conceptual analysis. Prima facie\, however\, improving conceptual schemes in a controlled and fruitful way presupposes an understanding of the conceptual status quo. Consequently the condemnation of conceptual analysis by conceptual engineers constitutes a paradox that needs to be taken far more seriously than has been the case. One reason why the paradox has escaped notice is even more paradoxical: leading conceptual engineers like Cappelen do not believe in the existence of concepts\, let alone in the possibility of changing them. By employing the tools of conceptual analysis\, this article will show that this is not a tenable position. At the minimum\, the projects trading under the name of conceptual engineering must aim at improving the way we categorize and reason about phenomena\, rather than altering our specific beliefs and theories (as in scientific theory-formation). And this presupposes a semantic self-understanding of the kind provided by a conceptual analysis that is both connective and impure: it elucidates concepts not in isolation\, but through their interconnections and their applications outside of philosophy.  My arguments for this conclusion will rely on a loosely speaking pragmatist semantics. Yet this does not constitute a petitio principii\, since that semantics captures the established notions of meaning and understanding that are presupposed even in semantic revisionism. \n\nZoom meeting ID: 857 3025 53 80\nZoom password: ACEW20 (Invite link) URL:/philevents/event/conceptual-engineering-seminar-tba-13/ LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, 58³Ô¹Ï\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom CATEGORIES:Conceptual Engineering Seminar END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR