BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.16.4.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20210506T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20210506T120000
DTSTAMP:20210506T102042Z
CREATED:20200819T113131Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210506T102042Z
UID:10001137-1620295200-1620302400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Super Special Seminar tba
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/super-special-seminar-tba-23/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, 58�Թ�\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Super Special Seminar series
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20210506T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20210506T143000
DTSTAMP:20210506T102042Z
CREATED:20200819T113131Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210506T102042Z
UID:10001138-1620306000-1620311400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Lara Jost “Knowledge: Emotions\, Perception and Rational Agents”
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: In contemporary analytic epistemology\, emotions are usually not considered to be a good justification for an agent’s belief\, in the same way perception\, memory\, reasoning or testimony are\, due to emotions facing issues when it comes to being reliable and sensitive to defeaters. In this talk\, I argue that this problem can be overcome if one reframes what is expected of emotions under rational guidance. Building on Jones (2003)\, I will propose that we need to consider emotions as participating to knowledge acquisition under a conception of epistemic agents as reason trackers rather than reason responders. This will enable me to build a model where the reliability and sensitivity of emotions can be explained through delayed calibration rather than immediate control. In order to strengthen this proposal\, I will highlight how perception is following the same pattern\, while benefiting from a better epistemic reputation than emotions. Finally\, I will discuss how the calibration of emotions is a dual process\, where calibration is influenced by both internal and social monitoring\, which explains why our emotions can offer good justification for belief.
URL:/philevents/event/epistemology-seminar-tba-18/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, 58�Թ�\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20210506T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20210506T173000
DTSTAMP:20210506T102043Z
CREATED:20200819T154433Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210506T102043Z
UID:10001191-1620316800-1620322200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk – Jesse Tomalty (University of Bergen)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Discrimination at the Border\n\nAbstract: In selecting among prospective immigrants\, it is widely accepted that states are morally permitted to differentiate on the basis of skill. By contrast\, differentiating among prospective immigrants on the basis of (perceived) traits such as race\, ethnicity\, or religion is widely held to amount to wrongful discrimination. I argue that these views are in tension. This is because the strongest account of why race\, ethnicity\, and religion are not morally acceptable criteria for selecting immigrants also rules out selection based on skill. What all of these criteria have in common is that their application fails to respect the moral equality of prospective immigrants. Given that states are obligated to respect the moral equality of all persons\, I argue that this implies that the set of morally acceptable criteria for selecting immigrants is narrower than many currently accept.
URL:/philevents/event/ceppa-talk-jesse-tomalty-university-of-bergen/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR