BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.16.4//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211123T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211123T140000
DTSTAMP:20260619T080441
CREATED:20210825T202427Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211123T172322Z
UID:10001375-1637668800-1637676000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language & Mind Seminar: Nick Allen (58�Թ�)
DESCRIPTION:Pluralist Meta-ethical Constructivism and Feminist Social Construction: \n\nMeta-ethical Constructivism holds that ethics is grounded upon shared values between agents in a society. In this sense a Constructivist thinks there are correct moral procedures dictated from the ‘moral point of view’ (Street\, 2008/2010)\, the following of which both gives answers to moral questions and justifies the moral values we receive as answers (Darwall et.al.\, 1992). From this\, a moral semantics view can follow in which moral terms are ‘explained by identifying the kinds of inferences (for example\, about means and ends) one must be making in order to count as employing normative concepts at all.’ (Street\, 2010) \nDespite basing their accounts on moral practice\, the correct moral procedures and moral point of view which constructivism evinces are considered to be monological. That is\, there is one correct moral point of view and one set of correct moral procedures for justifying moral values. \nI will argue that this is a mistake\, and that an alternative\, pluralist version of meta-ethical constructivism is both available and preferable. This pluralist meta-ethical constructivism is built out of an altogether different understanding of construction: feminist social construction. \nThe resultant view has both independent support and is able to overcome some challenges which face traditional constructivism\, most notably what I call “the thick/thin dilemma”.
URL:/philevents/event/language-and-mind-s1-12/
CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211123T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211123T170000
DTSTAMP:20260619T080441
CREATED:20210825T202427Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211123T172323Z
UID:10001376-1637679600-1637686800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Conceptual Engineering Seminar – Ishani Maitra (University of Michigan)
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/conceptual-engineering-seminar-21/
CATEGORIES:Conceptual Engineering Seminar
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR