BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.16.3//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231109T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231109T120000
DTSTAMP:20260614T211027
CREATED:20231109T140051Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231109T140051Z
UID:10001750-1699524000-1699531200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Plenary Seminar: No Meeting
DESCRIPTION:We use the plenary seminar time slot on occasions when we have a meeting of wider interest to the whole Arché community.
URL:/philevents/event/plenary-seminar-no-meeting/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231109T143000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231109T153000
DTSTAMP:20260614T211027
CREATED:20231106T160823Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231109T162308Z
UID:10001749-1699540200-1699543800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Moral Philosophy Reading Group
DESCRIPTION:This week will be a work-in-progress session\, discussing a draft paper by our very own Bradley Hillier-Smith\, on ‘Rights\, Duties and Inviolability’.  \nHere is the abstract: Rights entail corresponding negative duties not to violate those rights. On this\, all rights-theorists agree. Yet there is disagreement on whether rights also entail positive duties to protect and assist the right-holder if and when their rights are threatened. While the Interest Justification of Rights supports such positive duties (Raz 1986)\, defenders of the Inviolable Moral Status Justification of Rights reject them (Nozick 1974; Nagel 2007; Kamm 2008). On this latter view\, all persons have an inviolable moral status that gives rise to particularly robust rights and stringent negative duties\, but not additional positive duties\, which are not required to reflect persons’ inviolable moral status. This paper seeks to demonstrate that positive duties to protect and assist right-holders against rights-violations are in fact grounded by the very same justification invoked to ground the stringent rights and negative duties in the first instance: the inviolable moral status of persons. \nLocation: Edgecliffe G03 and Teams \nContact: ceppadirector@st-andrews.ac.uk
URL:/philevents/event/moral-philosophy-reading-group-111/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231109T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231109T173000
DTSTAMP:20260614T211027
CREATED:20230811T123916Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231109T162308Z
UID:10001703-1699545600-1699551000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (online) – Lara Buchak (Princeton)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Risk\, Ambiguity\, and Ethical Decision-Making \nAbstract: I argue that it can be rational to defer to an authority about what to believe or what to do even when doing so goes against one’s own reasoning. Indeed\, such deference is rational in typical cases in which individuals treat others as authorities: for example\, experts in a domain\, interpersonal advisors\, and religious traditions. I explain the interplay between authority\, reason\, and disagreement\, and how rational faith gives rise to epistemic communities and governs their encounters with each other. \nLocation: Teams (online only) and streamed from Edgecliffe G03.
URL:/philevents/event/ceppa-talk-online-lara-buchak-princeton/
LOCATION:Microsoft Teams
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
ORGANIZER;CN="Jessica Brown":MAILTO:jab30@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231109T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231109T173000
DTSTAMP:20260614T211027
CREATED:20231109T140051Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231109T140051Z
UID:10001751-1699545600-1699551000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Lara Buchak (Princeton) (co-hosted with CEPPA) “Faith\, Authority\, and Epistemic Communities”
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: I argue that it can be rational to defer to an authority about what to believe or what to do even when doing so goes against one’s own reasoning. Indeed\, such deference is rational in typical cases in which individuals treat others as authorities: for example\, experts in a domain\, interpersonal advisors\, and religious traditions. I explain the interplay between authority\, reason\, and disagreement\, and how rational faith gives rise to epistemic communities and governs their encounters with each other.
URL:/philevents/event/epistemology-seminar-lara-buchak-princeton-co-hosted-with-ceppa-faith-authority-and-epistemic-communities/
LOCATION:Online Meeting via Teams
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR