BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.16.3//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240627T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240627T120000
DTSTAMP:20260614T131204
CREATED:20240528T061256Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240627T093926Z
UID:10002089-1719482400-1719489600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Plenary Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/plenary-seminar-12/
CATEGORIES:Plenary session
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240627T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240627T143000
DTSTAMP:20260614T131204
CREATED:20240528T061310Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240627T093926Z
UID:10002090-1719493200-1719498600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Matt McGrath (Washington University in St Louis)
DESCRIPTION:Speaker: Matt McGrath (Washington University in St Louis) \nShould have Known and Epistemically Appropriate Belief\nSometimes people don’t know things they should have known. For instance\, cardiologists should know about recent major developments that bear on their practice; if they don’t know\, they should have. Can what a person should have known matter to what they’re epistemically appropriate to believe? Call the view that it can “should-have-known impurism.” If the cardiologist believes the usual treatment for a certain type of heart disease is best but should have known that an alternative treatment outperformed it in a recent large study\, it seems the cardiologist isn’t believing as she should. In this paper\, I dig into the reasoning behind or suggested by intuitions like this. Once we locate this reasoning\, we can probe its structure\, assess its quality\, and explore variations of it\, along with its relation to intuitions on the opposing “purist” side. In the end\, I argue that we can capture what the impurist gets right without accepting impurism. This is important because\, as I argue\, impurism faces serious problems.
URL:/philevents/event/epistemology-seminar-matthew-mcgrath-washington-university-in-st-louis/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240627T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240627T170000
DTSTAMP:20260614T131204
CREATED:20240528T061310Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240627T093926Z
UID:10002091-1719500400-1719507600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Unity Pre-Reading: Quasi-Analysis I
DESCRIPTION:Leitgeb\, Hannes (2007). A New Analysis of Quasianalysis. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (2):181-226. \nhttps://philpapers.org/rec/LEIANA-3
URL:/philevents/event/unity-pre-reading-quasi-analysis-i/
LOCATION:Arché Seminar Room\, 17-19 College Street\, 58�Թ�\, KY169AL
CATEGORIES:Unity Seminar
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR