BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.16.3//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Philosophy events
X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241015T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241015T140000
DTSTAMP:20260614T001435
CREATED:20240915T172448Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241008T183821Z
UID:10002159-1728993600-1729000800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind seminar:
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/language-and-mind-seminar-73/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241015T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241015T140000
DTSTAMP:20260614T001435
CREATED:20241009T183814Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241015T185309Z
UID:10002201-1728993600-1729000800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind seminar: Brice Bantegnie
DESCRIPTION:Title: It’s personal and it’s fine \nAbstract: Believing is something that one does\, or so one might say. Seeing as well. Detecting the edges of objects is not. Believing is a personal state. Seeing as well. Detecting is a sub-personal event or process. The personal/sub-personal distinction is intuitive. In recent papers\, some have argued that it is problematic. I argue that it is not. Two criticisms are that it is not principled (cf. Mason Westfall) and that it potentially stifles the work of cognitive scientists by misdescribing their practices (cf. Robert Rupert.) The personal/sub-personal distinction\, as applied to states\, is a special case of a distinction between the state something is in and the states its parts are in. Further commitments are not necessary and only come down the line. As a consequence\, one can both take it that there is such a distinction in cognitive science and that it puts no external constraint on the activity of cognitive scientists
URL:/philevents/event/language-and-mind-seminar-brice-bantegnie/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241015T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241015T170000
DTSTAMP:20260614T001435
CREATED:20240915T172500Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241013T185313Z
UID:10002160-1729004400-1729011600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:FPST Seminar:
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/fpst-seminar-20/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241015T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241015T170000
DTSTAMP:20260614T001435
CREATED:20241014T185311Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241015T185309Z
UID:10002209-1729004400-1729011600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:FPST Seminar: Naomi Kachani (58³Ô¹Ï) – In-person
DESCRIPTION:Title: Feminism and Multiculturalism: Measuring Gendered Cultural Harms \nAbstract: Deeply ingrained in the multiculturalism versus feminism debate is the idea that certain minority practices are more deserving of attention and criticism for their misogynistic undertones than other (liberal) practices. In this talk\, I’ll consider one of the potential reasons for this asymmetrical focus on minorities. Such argument maintains that many minority cultural practices are simply more harmful to women than their Western counterparts. I’ll go over how the ‘harm argument’ is embedded in the literature\, and then assess its conduciveness. Ultimately\, I’ll argue the ‘harm argument’ fails through its ill-suited selective points of comparisons\, its lack of contextual awareness\, and through its heavy reliance on ‘Gender Orientalist’ postulations.
URL:/philevents/event/fpst-seminar-naomi-kachani-st-andrews-in-person/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR