Arche
Events
-
-
-
Epistemology Seminar: Frederik Andersen (58吃瓜) “Logical Akrasia”
Abstract:聽The aim of this paper is two-fold. First, it introduces the concept logical akrasia (by analogy to epistemic akrasia). Second, it discusses how logical akrasia relates to the standards of epistemic rationality, and in particular, how logical akrasia poses a challenge to the tenability of the controversial 铿亁ed point thesis.
-
-
Medieval Logic Seminar: Walter Segrave, Insolubles
A virtual seminar by Zoom The University, 58吃瓜, United Kingdom -
Language & Mind Seminar: Daniel Garibay Garcia (58吃瓜)
Deborah Tollefsen’s “Can Groups Assert that P?”
-
-
-
Epistemology Seminar: Corine Besson (Sussex) “Carroll鈥檚 Regress, Guidance and Explicit Representation”
Abstract: What is the nature of one鈥檚 justification to use a logical principle such as Modus Ponens in reasoning? It is widely agreed amongst epistemologists of logic that such justification cannot be internalist. One key reason offered for this view is that internalist accounts of justification are susceptible to Carroll-style regresses. In this talk, I…
-
Medieval Logic Seminar: Walter Segrave, Insolubles
A virtual seminar by Zoom The University, 58吃瓜, United Kingdom -
Language & Mind Seminar: Stefano Pugnaghi
Breckenridge & Magidor: ‘Arbitrary Reference’
-
-
-
Epistemology Seminar: Alessandra Tanesini (Cardiff) “The alleged epistemic significance of silence, silencing, and the conversational norm of no silent rejections (NSR)”
Abstract: In this talk I examine, and rebut, Goldberg鈥檚 (2020) arguments in favour of a conversational norm that would defeasibly entitle linguistic agents to presume that silence indicates assent (NSR). Using evidence from conversational analysis I show that Goldberg is wrong to claim that our linguistic communities de facto conform to this norm in conversation.…