BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.16.4//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20220317T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20220317T173000
DTSTAMP:20260618T193838
CREATED:20220113T235337Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220317T202423Z
UID:10001513-1647532800-1647538200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Lara Jost – CEPPA Work-In-Progress Talk
DESCRIPTION:Title: The Labours of Chronic Illness \nAbstract: In this presentation\, I aim to explain the three types of labour- administrative labour\, hermeneutic labour and epistemic labour- that chronically ill people have to engage in to get good care. The goal is to highlight why being chronically ill is often considered by many chronically ill people to be a full-time or part-time job\, often without being recognized as such by others. I focus on the epistemic labour and the hermeneutic labour and explain why they are disproportionately higher when it comes to certain chronic illnesses. I argue that this higher cost is in part the result of a deep disagreement about how these patients should testify about their illness\, caused by a cluster of types of epistemic injustices. To illustrate this dynamic\, I attend to the applied case of endometriosis\, a gynaecological chronic illness causing pelvic pain and infertility. Finally\, I offer some avenues for improvement that the healthcare system could focus on to lessen the epistemic and hermeneutic labour of chronic illness and improve the lives of chronically ill people.
URL:/philevents/event/lara-jost-ceppa-work-in-progress-talk/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
ORGANIZER;CN="Nick Kuespert":MAILTO:nk94@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20220324T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20220324T173000
DTSTAMP:20260618T193838
CREATED:20220113T235337Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220321T203814Z
UID:10001514-1648137600-1648143000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Enrico Galvagni – CEPPA Work-In-Progress Talk
DESCRIPTION:Title: Hume’s Account of Virtue and Its Place in the History of Ethics \nAbstract: Hume’s account of virtue is notoriously puzzling. On the one hand\, he claims that the virtues are qualities useful or agreeable to oneself or to others. On the other\, he says that they are qualities which give a pleasing sentiment of approbation to a spectator. In this paper\, I argue that these two claims are part of one unified definition of virtue and that Hume’s apparently idiosyncratic account is best explained historically. To do so\, I show that Hume inherited from Natural Law theorists (such as Pufendorf and Locke) the problem of squaring the existence of morality with the belief that physical entities have\, in themselves\, no moral relevance. The solution offered by his predecessors\, however\, was not available to Hume who refused to ground morality in the authoritative command of God. I claim that Hume’s account of virtue has to be explained as an attempt to introduce a naturalistic and secular solution to this central problem in the history of ethics.  
URL:/philevents/event/enrico-galvagni-ceppa-work-in-progress-talk/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
ORGANIZER;CN="Luca Stroppa":MAILTO:ls330@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20220331T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20220331T173000
DTSTAMP:20260618T193838
CREATED:20220316T202415Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220331T210808Z
UID:10001522-1648742400-1648747800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (in person) – Thomas Schmidt (Humboldt-University)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Edgecliffe G03 \nTitle: Ought and the Transmission of Reasons \nAbstract: According to the widely held Weightiest Reasons view about how reasons for action and the practical ought are related to one another\, \n(WR)  an agent ought to φ if\, and only if\, the reasons for φ are weightier than the reasons for every incompatible alternative to φ. \nI show that complementing (WR) in a way that results in an extensionally adequate account is surprisingly difficult and compromises intuitive plausibility. In particular\, it turns out that (WR) only returns correct results when it is combined with principles of reasons transmission some of which entail an implausible proliferation of reasons. Even so\, the theoretical package that friends of (WR) must accept is to be preferred over competing views.
URL:/philevents/event/ceppa-talk-in-person-thomas-schmidt-humboldt-university/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR