BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.16.3//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Philosophy events
X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260402T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260402T173000
DTSTAMP:20260612T003534
CREATED:20260123T185310Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260402T132314Z
UID:10002679-1775145600-1775151000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (in-person) – Kal Kalewold (Leeds)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Going First: Integration with Compensation as a Duty of Justice. \nAbstract: Racial segregation remains deeply entrenched in many societies such as the United States. (Liberal) integrationists argue that we have a duty to integrate because integration is necessary for racial justice (Anderson 2010). (Egalitarian) pluralists reject a duty to integrate (Shelby 2014\, 2016). They hold that integration impermissibly imposes costs on the disadvantaged. On the pluralist view\, we should instead endeavour to make communities better off however they are spatially distributed. In this talk\, I defend a duty to integrate with compensation. I draw on evidence that has been neglected in the philosophical literature that the costs of integration are differentially distributed across age groups. Compensating those integrating first undermines the foundation of the pluralist objection and vindicates a duty to integrate. \nLocation: Edgecliffe G03 and online on teams
URL:/philevents/event/ceppa-talk-in-person-kal-kalewold-leeds/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260416T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260416T173000
DTSTAMP:20260612T003534
CREATED:20260123T185310Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260416T135310Z
UID:10002680-1776355200-1776360600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (in-person) – Matthew Vermaire (58³Ô¹Ï)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Conflated Questions in the Ethics of Belief \nAbstract: It’s common to suppose that epistemology can be understood in close structural parallel with ethics: as ethics is about what to do\, epistemology is about what to believe. In this paper I draw attention to an important limit of such parallelisms: in reasoning to belief\, agents are concerned in the first instance not with what to believe but with the uniquely theoretical question of what is the case. I demonstrate the relevance this distinction in questions has for the debate between pragmatists and evidentialists in the ethics of belief\, and I suggest a compromise that I expect no one to like. \n\nLocation: Edgecliffe G03 and online on teams
URL:/philevents/event/ceppa-talk-in-person-matthew-vermaire-st-andrews/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260423T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260423T173000
DTSTAMP:20260612T003534
CREATED:20260123T185323Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260423T135311Z
UID:10002681-1776960000-1776965400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Climate Ethics Talk (online and in-person) – Jiewuh Song (Seoul National University)
DESCRIPTION:Title: The Right to a Healthy Environment and the Case of Climate Change \nAbstract: Once regarded as a marginal proposal in international human rights\, the right to a healthy environment has gained surprisingly widespread acceptance in domestic law across the world.  Recently\, the right has become an important part of global climate advocacy\, often anchoring legal arguments for climate action. Yet the status of the right to a healthy environment in international human rights law remains uncertain\, and theoretical suspicion about its justifiability persists.  Using the climate case as an illustrative example and drawing on both human rights theory and recent case law\, I present a justification of the right to a healthy environment as a distinctly useful response to what I call structural threats to human rights\, or widespread and causally opaque threats to the urgent interests that human rights are meant to protect.  This justification helps to guide our thinking about the content and adjudication of the right to a healthy environment. \nLocation: Edgecliffe G03 and online on teams
URL:/philevents/event/ceppa-climate-ethics-talk-in-person-jiewuh-song-seoul-national-university/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR