BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.17.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Philosophy events
X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260603T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260603T170000
DTSTAMP:20260531T205311Z
CREATED:20260305T084345Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260531T205311Z
UID:10002774-1780498800-1780506000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics & Logic Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-logic-seminar-21/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260603T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260603T170000
DTSTAMP:20260603T210811Z
CREATED:20260601T205308Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260603T210811Z
UID:10002905-1780498800-1780506000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics & Logic Seminar: Gill Russell: “Normativity\, Neutrality\, and Normativity and Neutrality”
DESCRIPTION:Neutrality and normativity have both attracted attention in the recent philosophy of logic. In this paper I ask: can we consistently hold that logic is both non-neutral and non-normative when it comes to logics for normative sentences? (e.g. deontic logics.) If these fail to be neutral won’t they commit themselves on questions of substantive normative theory? That would seem to make logic—at least this part of it—normative after all.
URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-logic-seminar-gill-russell-normativity-neutrality-and-normativity-and-neutrality/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260610T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260610T170000
DTSTAMP:20260531T205325Z
CREATED:20260312T085611Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260531T205325Z
UID:10002784-1781103600-1781110800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics & Logic Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-logic-seminar-22/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260610T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260610T170000
DTSTAMP:20260610T210809Z
CREATED:20260601T205321Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260610T210809Z
UID:10002906-1781103600-1781110800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics & Logic Seminar: Harry Vincent: “Must We Say What We May”
DESCRIPTION:Abstract:   \nNormative inferentialist approaches to semantics in the tradition of Robert Brandom have traditionally focused on challenging as the appropriate response to an unentitled claim in an assertion-based autonomous discursive practice (ADP). In this paper I argue that purportedly unentitled claiming is likely to be far more prevalent than we might think in such a practice\, and that in many of these cases challenging will not be an appropriate or efficient way to respond to a claim judged not to be entitled. I develop an alternative account of how speakers might respond to unentitled assertions\, by attempting to take on the perspective of the unentitled claimant\, and show how the abilities required to engage in this alternative practice are already presupposed by Brandom’s account of the ADP. I also show how my account provides us with insights into the development of further reasoning practices of a more or less desirable character\, including abduction\, rationalisation and compartmentalisation.
URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-logic-seminar-harry-vincent-must-we-say-what-we-may/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260617T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260617T170000
DTSTAMP:20260608T210822Z
CREATED:20260319T091208Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260608T210822Z
UID:10002801-1781708400-1781715600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics & Logic Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-logic-seminar-23/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260617T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260617T170000
DTSTAMP:20260617T212308Z
CREATED:20260609T210808Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260617T212308Z
UID:10002911-1781708400-1781715600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics & Logic Seminar: Amie Thomasson: “Yeah to Truth\, or: The functions of Truth Talk”
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: What are the functions of the predicate ‘is true’ or the noun ‘truth’? Descriptivists assume that the predicate serves to describe a property\, which propositions possess if they correspond to the right sort of facts in the world. Pragmatists and deflationists have suggested instead that the truth predicate plays useful roles in encouraging debate and friction or enabling us to form generalizations. This paper argues draws on work in systemic functional linguistics to develop a step-by-step account of the functions served through different grammatical developments: having practices of acceptance and rejection of propositions\, introducing a truth predicate\, and finally introducing a noun for ‘truth’. The resulting view gives us a way of justifying some prior pragmatic and deflationary suggestions\, while also showing that their views about the function of truth talk are compatible and may form different parts of a more complete picture. 
URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-logic-seminar-amie-thomasson-yeah-to-truth-or-the-functions-of-truth-talk/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260624T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260624T170000
DTSTAMP:20260614T210823Z
CREATED:20260326T222448Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260614T210823Z
UID:10002809-1782313200-1782320400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics & Logic Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-logic-seminar-24/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260625T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260625T170000
DTSTAMP:20260625T213807Z
CREATED:20260615T212327Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260625T213807Z
UID:10002914-1782399600-1782406800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic & Philosophy of Language: Joint Seminar: Presenter: Salvatore Florio
DESCRIPTION:Presenter: Salvatore Florio
URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-logic-seminar-no-ml-this-week/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe 104\, University of 58�Թ�\, 58�Թ�\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR