BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.16.3//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260610T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260610T170000
DTSTAMP:20260611T151330
CREATED:20260312T085611Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260531T205325Z
UID:10002784-1781103600-1781110800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics & Logic Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-logic-seminar-22/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260610T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260610T170000
DTSTAMP:20260611T151330
CREATED:20260601T205321Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260610T210809Z
UID:10002906-1781103600-1781110800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics & Logic Seminar: Harry Vincent: “Must We Say What We May”
DESCRIPTION:Abstract:   \nNormative inferentialist approaches to semantics in the tradition of Robert Brandom have traditionally focused on challenging as the appropriate response to an unentitled claim in an assertion-based autonomous discursive practice (ADP). In this paper I argue that purportedly unentitled claiming is likely to be far more prevalent than we might think in such a practice\, and that in many of these cases challenging will not be an appropriate or efficient way to respond to a claim judged not to be entitled. I develop an alternative account of how speakers might respond to unentitled assertions\, by attempting to take on the perspective of the unentitled claimant\, and show how the abilities required to engage in this alternative practice are already presupposed by Brandom’s account of the ADP. I also show how my account provides us with insights into the development of further reasoning practices of a more or less desirable character\, including abduction\, rationalisation and compartmentalisation.
URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-logic-seminar-harry-vincent-must-we-say-what-we-may/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR