Metaphysics and Logic group
Events
-
-
-
Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: NO MEETING
No M&L meeting because of a concurrent School Council meeting.
-
-
Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Aybüke Özgün (University of Amsterdam)
Edgecliffe G03 and via MS TeamsTitle: Beliefs based on conflicting and uncertain evidence: connecting Dempster-Shafer theory and the topology of evidence Abstract: One problem to solve in the context of information fusion, decision-making, and other artificial intelligence challenges is to compute justified beliefs based on evidence. In real-life examples, this evidence may be inconsistent, incomplete, or uncertain, making the problem…
-
-
Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Roy Sorensen (UT Austin and University of 58³Ô¹Ï)
Edgecliffe G03 and via MS TeamsTitle: Seeing Holes-without seeing what they are holes in Abstract: Peering down into a tall box, you see a ring. The ring is removed. To your surprise this uncovers a second duplicate ring. Did you see the hole of the bottom ring before you saw the bottom ring? Each answer is backed by good reasons.…
-
Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Zoé McConaughey (University of Lille)
Online Meeting via TeamsTitle: History of logic as a tool for exploring the plurality of logical frameworks Abstract: I will outline another type of logical pluralism than the one now famously proposed by Beall and Restall (2006). I will argue that in addition to paying attention to particular logics, such as classical, intuitionnistic, relevance logics, etc., it is…
-
Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Sabina DomÃnguez Parrado (University of 58³Ô¹Ï and University of Amsterdam)
Edgecliffe G03 and via MS TeamsTitle: A New Problem for Logical Contextualism Abstract: Logical contextualism is the view that ‘valid’ is a context-sensitive expression. One key reason to endorse logical contextualism is that, unlike traditional forms of logical pluralism, it can avoid the so-called collapse problem. Logical contextualism relies on the crucial assumption that each conversational context determines a uniquely appropriate logical consequence…
-
Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Matteo Nizzardo (University of 58³Ô¹Ï and University of Stirling)
Edgecliffe G03 and via MS TeamsTitle: Reference Without Identity Abstract: Singular reference to non-individuals is often thought to be impossible. At present, however, this claim rests solely on intuitions. In this paper, I present four arguments in favour of the impossibility of singular reference to non-individuals.
-
Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Hannes Leitgeb (MCMP)
Title: When Rules Define Logical Operators: Rules as Second-Order Definitions Abstract: Logical inferentialists hold that the meaning of logical operators is given by their rules of inference. Arthur Prior cast doubt on this by introducing rules for his so-called tonk operator that seemed to allow for the derivation of any sentence whatsoever from any sentence…
-
-
Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: NO MEETING
Edgecliffe G03 and via MS TeamsNo meeting due to the concurrent CEPPA Fest.
-
Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Isaac Wilhelm (National University of Singapore)
Title: Talk About Types Abstract: Many metaphysical theories of identity, existence, and so on, are formulated using higher-order languages like the simply typed lambda calculus. But as I argue, for the purposes of metaphysical theorizing, a different language would be better: the calculus of constructions. Since this language—like many pure type systems—allows for quantification over…
-
Metaphysics and Logic Seminar x FPST Seminar: Marta Sznajder (University of Vienna)
Edgecliffe G03 and via MS TeamsJanina Hosiasson’s logic of rational degrees of belief: subjective probability before and after Ramsey Abstract: In 1931, Janina Hosiasson-Lindenbaum proposed a proto-decision-theoretic answer to the value of evidence problem, originally posed by C. D. Broad and eventually solved by I. J. Good in the context of Savage’s decision theory. As an influence on her paper…