BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.16.5.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Philosophy events
X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211103T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211103T180000
DTSTAMP:20211103T160811Z
CREATED:20210805T183036Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211103T160811Z
UID:10001356-1635955200-1635962400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory Seminar: Lara Jost
DESCRIPTION:For this session\, Lara Jost will lead a discussion of the second chapter of Myisha Cherry’s new book ‘The Case for Rage: Why Anger is Essential to Anti-Racist Struggle’. \nTitle: Fitting Fury and Frightful Rage\, Myisha Cherry\nAbstract: Chapter 2 argues that Lordean rage is an appropriate response to racial injustice and is more likely to correctly represent racial injustice than the other variations of rage. The chapter claims that this apt and correct Lordean rage is morally and politically valuable because it not only registers racial injustice but it appreciates justice. Lordean rage says that racial justice is worth having. It also not only marks disvalue\, but it is a way to respond to the value that racial minorities in the United States have. The chapter also explores ways to escape strategic traps set by others to make the outraged doubt their anger and give it up.
URL:/philevents/event/philosophy-and-social-theory-seminar-7/
CATEGORIES:Philosophy & Social Theory Arché Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211110T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211110T180000
DTSTAMP:20211110T162309Z
CREATED:20210812T190914Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211110T162309Z
UID:10001363-1636560000-1636567200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory Seminar: Colin Troesken
DESCRIPTION:Colin Troesken will lead a discussion of Anne Eaton’s paper ‘A Lady on the Street but a Freak in the Bed’: On the Distinction Between Erotic Art and Pornography (abstract below). \nPlease be aware that the paper includes examples of the sorts of erotic art under discussion. As usual\, the discussion leader will provide a short summary of the paper and we encourage those who have not had time to read the paper in full to still participate in the discussion. \n\n\nTitle: ‘A Lady on the Street but a Freak in the Bed’: On the Distinction Between Erotic Art and Pornography \n\n\nAbstract: How\, if at all\, are we to distinguish between the works that we call ‘art’ and those that we call ‘pornography’? This question gets a grip because from classical Greek vases and the frescoes of Pompeii to Renaissance mythological painting and sculpture to Modernist prints\, the European artistic tradition is chock-full of art that looks a lot like pornography. In this paper I propose a way of thinking about the distinction that is grounded in art historical considerations regarding the function of erotic images in 16 th -century Italy. This exploration suggests that the root of the erotic art/pornography distinction was—at least in this context—class: in particular\, the need for a special category of unsanctioned illicit images arose at the very time when print culture was beginning to threaten elite privilege. What made an erotic representation exceed the boundaries of acceptability\, I suggest\, was not its extreme libidinosity but\, rather\, its widespread availability and\, thereby\, its threat to one of the mechanisms of sustaining class privilege.
URL:/philevents/event/philosophy-and-social-theory-seminar-8/
CATEGORIES:Philosophy & Social Theory Arché Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211117T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211117T180000
DTSTAMP:20211110T162310Z
CREATED:20210819T195430Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211110T162310Z
UID:10001370-1637164800-1637172000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:/philevents/event/philosophy-and-social-theory-seminar-9/
CATEGORIES:Philosophy & Social Theory Arché Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211124T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211124T180000
DTSTAMP:20211124T172308Z
CREATED:20210826T202429Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211124T172308Z
UID:10001378-1637769600-1637776800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory Seminar: Jade Fletcher
DESCRIPTION:Jade Fletcher will be giving a presentation titled ‘Social Structures\, Ideology and Bad Sex‘ at 4-6pm Wednesday. If you would like to attend please email Emilia Wilson (ew58@st-andrews.ac.uk) for the link.\n\n\n\nTitle: Social Structures\, Ideology\, and Bad Sex\n\nAbstract: This paper is concerned with providing an explanatory framework for thinking about a particular type of ethically bad sex. I argue that much of the current literature on bad sex\, which takes consent to be the lens through which bad sex should be viewed\, is unable to adequately capture an interesting set of cases of bad sex. I argue that we should make sense of what has gone wrong in these cases in terms of unjust social structures creating the conditions for bad events.
URL:/philevents/event/philosophy-and-social-theory-seminar-10/
CATEGORIES:Philosophy & Social Theory Arché Seminar
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR