Events

Events Search and Views Navigation

Event Views Navigation

Filters

Changing any of the form inputs will cause the list of events to refresh with the filtered results.

Today

  • Epistemology Seminar: Frederik Andersen “Engel鈥檚 Dilemma and the Horrors of Logical Disagreement”

    A virtual seminar by Zoom The University, 58吃瓜, United Kingdom

    Abstract: Hinge propositions, or simply 鈥渉inges鈥�, are primitive certainties that we (must) presuppose in our normal inquiries. Recently there has been a lot of interest in hinge epistemology, which is a kind of epistemology that sets the notion of hinge at the center stage. This paper puts forward a dilemma leveled against hinge epistemologists. The…

  • Metaphysics and Logic Seminar Joaquim Giannotti (University of Birmingham)

    A virtual seminar by Zoom The University, 58吃瓜, United Kingdom

    Title: Fundamentality and Humean Laws of Ground Abstract:聽What grounds facts of ground? Some metaphysicians invoke fundamental grounding laws to answer this question. These are general principles that link grounded facts to their grounds. The main business of this talk聽is to advance the debate about the metaphysics of grounding laws by exploring the prospects of a…

  • Conceptual Engineering Seminar |聽Manuel Gustavo Isaac (SNSF/58吃瓜): “The Hallmark Problem”

    A virtual seminar by Zoom The University, 58吃瓜, United Kingdom

    ABSTRACT. 鈥斅犫�楥onceptual engineering鈥� is the new buzzword in the world of聽philosophical methods. Yet, on some accounts, it is hard to see what is really聽new about it鈥攊f anything. The present talk tackles this hallmark problem for聽conceptual engineering through an analysis of the engineering process itself,聽taking the engineering label at face value. ZOOM INFO Meeting ID:聽892 5895…

  • Epistemology Seminar: Catarina Dutilh Novaes “Argumentation and a three-tiered model of epistemic exchange”

    A virtual seminar by Zoom The University, 58吃瓜, United Kingdom

    Abstract: Argumentation is often contrasted with testimony in that in cases of testimony, an epistemic agent (presumably) primarily evaluates the trustworthiness of the source of information (the informant), whereas in argumentation there is (presumably) primarily engagement with the content communicated. I have argued however (Dutilh Novaes 2020) that trust and trustworthiness in fact play an…