• Metaphysics and Logic Seminar Helen Beebee (University of Manchester)

    A virtual seminar by Zoom The University, 58³Ô¹Ï, United Kingdom

    Title: The Genesis of Lewis’s Counterfactual Analysis of Causation Abstract: Lewis presented a prototype counterfactual analysis of causation back in 1958 — aged just 16 or 17 — in the very first undergraduate philosophy essay he ever wrote. I place this paper in its historical context, relating it to the state of the debate at…

  • CEPPA Talk – Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Lok Chan (Duke University)

    Title: ‘Should Responsibility Affect Who Gets a Kidney?’ Abstract: About 98,000 people in the US are waiting for a kidney transplant, but only around 20,000 kidneys become available each year. As a result, doctors sometimes have to decide who gets a kidney. Many people (though few medical providers) hold that, when two patients need the…

  • Breaking Down the Barriers: Applied Conceptual Engineering (ACE)

    A virtual Conference – by Zoom

      DESCRIPTION Conceptual engineering focuses on how best to assess and improve our conceptual apparatuses. In less than half a decade, it has become a central topic of contemporary analytic philosophy. Current work in conceptual engineering goes in two main directions. Case study research, on the one hand, which focuses on specific concepts and then…

  • Epistemology Seminar (joint with CEPPA and FPST): Emmalon Davis (UMich) “Challenging the Pursuit of Novelty”

    A virtual seminar by Zoom The University, 58³Ô¹Ï, United Kingdom

    Abstract: Novelty—understood as the value of saying something new—appears to be a good-making feature of a philosophical contribution. Beyond this, however, novelty functions as a marker of philosophical success: contributions that say something new are considered successful, while contributions that do not say something new are considered unsuccessful. When novelty serves as a marker and metric…

  • CEPPA Talk – Emmalon Davis (Michigan)

    Title: ‘Challenging the Pursuit of Novelty’ Abstract: Novelty—understood as the value of saying something new—appears to be a good-making feature of a philosophical contribution. Beyond this, however, novelty functions as a marker of philosophical success: contributions that say something new are considered successful, while contributions that do not say something new are considered unsuccessful. When…