BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.16.3//NONSGML v1.0//EN CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H X-Robots-Tag:noindex X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/London BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0000 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:BST DTSTART:20220327T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0000 TZNAME:GMT DTSTART:20221030T010000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0000 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:BST DTSTART:20230326T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0000 TZNAME:GMT DTSTART:20231029T010000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0000 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:BST DTSTART:20240331T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0000 TZNAME:GMT DTSTART:20241027T010000 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231211T093000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231211T110000 DTSTAMP:20260614T222526 CREATED:20231109T140432Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231211T170330Z UID:10001778-1702287000-1702292400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Ralph Strode\, Treatise on Consequences DESCRIPTION: URL:/philevents/event/medieval-logic-seminar-ralph-strode-treatise-on-consequences-5/ LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231212T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231214T130000 DTSTAMP:20260614T222526 CREATED:20230915T131022Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231212T174446Z UID:10001726-1702371600-1702558800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:The Future of Work and Income Conference DESCRIPTION:The Future of Work and Income Research Network    (fwistandrews@gmail.com) \nCentre for Ethics\, Philosophy\, and Public Affairs \nDepartment of Philosophy\, University of 58³Ô¹Ï \nWorkshop to be held in person \nFree to attend \nConfirmed Speakers: \nAnca Gheaus\, Central Europea University \nAndrea Veltman\, James Madison University \nPhilippe Van Parijs\, University of Leuven URL:/philevents/event/the-future-of-work-and-income-conference/ END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231212T120000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231212T140000 DTSTAMP:20260614T222526 CREATED:20231109T140432Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231212T170050Z UID:10001779-1702382400-1702389600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Language and Mind Seminar: Jack Shardlow (University of Edinburgh) DESCRIPTION:Title: Motion(less) Pictures and Temporal Appearances \nAbstract: In this session I will present some work-in-progress which connects issues in the philosophy of mind\, concerning temporal appearances\, with the metaphysics of aesthetics\, while also incorporating some insights regarding our use of perceptual verbs. \nViewing typical moving images (i.e.\, animations/video recordings)\, we see what appears to be a variety of objects\, subjects\, and their various respective activities unfolding over time. Viewing a still image (i.e.\, paintings/photographs) we also see what appears to be a variety of objects and subjects\, and we see them as appearing to be engaged in various activities\, though we do not see what appears to be these activities unfolding over time. This should sound much like common sense. Yet\, the tenability of these claims depends on making explicit much that is only implicit. To make good sense of our experiential encounter with imagistic representations of activity\, we need to say more about our talk of ‘temporal appearances’\, and the comparisons and contrasts between the appearances presented by moving images and still images. Ultimately\, I argue that we should make room for two dissociable forms of temporal appearance: a dynamic pattern of appearance of Ï•-ing over time\, and the appearance of an object as an object that is Ï•-ing. \nOne further key aim in the talk is drawing the proper distinction between still and moving images. As noted by Danto (2006) and Walton (2008)\, moving images of static scenes can be visually indistinguishable from still images of the same scene; yet the two are experienced differently. I argue that this observation can be best explained\, with the two dissociable forms of temporal appearance\, if – unlike Danto and Walton – we take the differentia between still and moving images to simply be that the latter presents a duration\, while the former does not. While this might sound like common sense\, in making this case I dispute claims which notable authors have said to be ‘obvious’ (e.g.\, Carroll 2021). URL:/philevents/event/language-and-mind-seminar-jack-shardlow-university-of-edinburgh/ LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231212T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231212T170000 DTSTAMP:20260614T222526 CREATED:20231109T140432Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231114T142336Z UID:10001780-1702393200-1702400400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:FPST Seminar DESCRIPTION: URL:/philevents/event/fpst-seminar-5/ LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231212T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231212T170000 DTSTAMP:20260614T222526 CREATED:20231115T143959Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231210T165315Z UID:10001807-1702393200-1702400400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:FPST Seminar – Emma Holmes (58³Ô¹Ï & Stirling) DESCRIPTION:This week will be a reading group. The reading is TBC. URL:/philevents/event/fpst-seminar-emma-holmes-st-andrews-stirling/ LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231212T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231212T170000 DTSTAMP:20260614T222526 CREATED:20231211T170330Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231212T170050Z UID:10001815-1702393200-1702400400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:FPST Seminar – Emma Holmes (58³Ô¹Ï & Stirling) DESCRIPTION:This week will be a reading group on Gayle Rubin’s ‘Thinking sex’ URL:/philevents/event/fpst-seminar-emma-holmes-st-andrews-stirling-2/ LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231213T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231213T170000 DTSTAMP:20260614T222526 CREATED:20231109T140433Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231213T170842Z UID:10001781-1702479600-1702486800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Jarred Snodgrass (University of 58³Ô¹Ï and University of Stirling) DESCRIPTION:Title: On the Hyperintensions of Properties \nAbstract: Hyperintensionalists encounter two serious problems that cast doubt on their view of property identity\, both stem from when insufficient attention is paid to the hyperintensions of properties. The first problem is what I call the ‘Granularity Problem’. It is the problem of finding a criterion of identity for properties that can distinguish between co-intensional properties. The second problem is what I call the ‘Difference-Maker Problem’. It is the problem of determining what makes a given hyperintensional distinction between properties a non-representational difference and not merely a representational difference. In this paper\, I propose a hyperintensional theory of property identity and show how it resolves each problem. After that\, I consider two objections to this theory and defend it from both of them. URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-jarred-snodgrass-university-of-st-andrews-and-university-of-stirling/ LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231214T130000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231214T143000 DTSTAMP:20260614T222526 CREATED:20231109T140433Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231214T170926Z UID:10001783-1702558800-1702564200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: DESCRIPTION: URL:/philevents/event/epistemology-seminar-23/ END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231214T143000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231214T153000 DTSTAMP:20260614T222526 CREATED:20231017T152333Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231214T180042Z UID:10001741-1702564200-1702567800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Moral Philosophy Reading Group DESCRIPTION:Location: Edgecliffe G03 and Teams \nContact: ceppadirector@st-andrews.ac.uk URL:/philevents/event/moral-philosophy-reading-group-107/ END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231214T160000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231214T173000 DTSTAMP:20260614T222526 CREATED:20230915T131022Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231214T180042Z UID:10001728-1702569600-1702575000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (online) – Matthew Liao (NYU) DESCRIPTION:Title: Threshold Deontology: Some Lessons from Vagueness \nAbtract: Threshold Deontology is the view that the positive consequences of an act do not normally override moral constraints\, but when the positive balance of the consequences of an act is sufficiently great\, it may be morally permitted\, and possibly required to engage in an act that is otherwise morally prohibited. While many people find Threshold Deontology attractive\, there are a number of issues regarding its nature and its structure that are under explored.  For instance\, suppose that there is a threshold above which a moral constraint against killing an innocent person becomes overridden.  Where is this threshold?  How do we identify it?  In addition\, what happens after one crosses this threshold?  Does one become a full-on act-consequentialist?  Drawing on the literature on vagueness\, I shall argue that there is a sharp threshold for killing and that it is difficult for us to know where this threshold lies because in a certain range of cases\, our moral faculty is not sufficiently reliable to be able to weigh competing moral values.  I shall also explain why one does not become a consequentialist once one crosses the threshold for killing. \nLocation: Teams (online only) URL:/philevents/event/ceppa-talk-online-matthew-liao-nyu/ LOCATION:Microsoft Teams CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk ORGANIZER;CN="Enrico Galvagni":MAILTO:eg240@st-andrews.ac.uk END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR