Might reality itself be indeterminate? And if so, how can we coherently theorise about it? This conference seeks to bring together researchers interested in this emerging topic and be an occasion to widen and deepen the debate around it. To reflect the interdisciplinary interest in this topic, the conference will feature contributions from traditional metaphysics, social metaphysics, and science-informed metaphysics.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The conference booklet is available here<\/a>.<\/p>\n 9.45-10 Welcome (and coffee)<\/p>\n 10.10-10.30 Introductory remarks\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n 10.30-11.30 Maureen Donnelly: Distinguishing between Vague and Precise Objects<\/i><\/i><\/p>\n 11.30-11.45 quick break<\/p>\n 11.45-12.45 Aaron Cotnoir: Close Enough to Touch: How to Approximate Boundaries for Ordinary Objects<\/em><\/p>\n 12.45-14.15 lunch break<\/p>\n 14.15-15.15 King Fung Kelvin Chan: Metaphysical Indeterminacy, Social Construction, and Reasonable Pluralism\u00a0<\/span><\/i><\/i><\/p>\n 15.15-15.30 quick break<\/p>\n 15.30-16.30 Kevin Richardson: Fear of Social Indeterminacy<\/i><\/p>\n 9.15-9.30 coffee\/tea<\/p>\n 9.30-10.30 Alessandro Torza: Metaphysical Indeterminacy and Chance<\/i><\/i><\/p>\n 10.30-10.45 Quick break<\/p>\n 10.45-11.45 Kamil Furman: Relational Metaphysical Indeterminacy: A New Account for Lowe\u2019s Scenario Against Evans\u2019 Proof<\/i><\/i><\/p>\n 11.45-12 Quick break<\/p>\n 12-13 George Darby: \u2018Quantum indeterminacy’ and Metaphysical Methodology<\/i><\/i><\/p>\n 13-14.30 lunch break<\/p>\n 14.30-15.30 Will Moorfoot: Rich Combinatorics<\/i><\/i><\/p>\n 15.30-15.45 Quick break<\/p>\n 15.45-16.45 Robert Williams: Inconceivable Indeterminacy<\/i><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Sponsors: Arch\u00e9 Research Centre<\/a>, Analysis<\/a>, \u00a0Aristotelian Society<\/a>, ISOS<\/a>, Mind Association<\/a>, Scots Philosophical Association<\/a><\/p>\nConference program\u00a0<\/strong><\/h3>\n
Day 1<\/strong><\/h4>\n
Day 2<\/strong><\/h4>\n