{"id":16021,"date":"2026-06-01T21:53:21","date_gmt":"2026-06-01T20:53:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/event\/metaphysics-logic-seminar-harry-vincent-must-we-say-what-we-may\/"},"modified":"2026-06-10T22:08:09","modified_gmt":"2026-06-10T21:08:09","slug":"metaphysics-logic-seminar-harry-vincent-must-we-say-what-we-may","status":"publish","type":"tribe_events","link":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/event\/metaphysics-logic-seminar-harry-vincent-must-we-say-what-we-may\/","title":{"rendered":"Metaphysics &amp; Logic Seminar: Harry Vincent: &#8220;Must We Say What We May&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span data-olk-copy-source=\"MessageBody\"><strong>Abstract:<\/strong> \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-olk-copy-source=\"MessageBody\">Normative inferentialist approaches to semantics in the tradition of <\/span>Robert Brandom have traditionally focused on challenging as the appropriate response to an unentitled claim in an assertion-based autonomous discursive practice (ADP). In this paper I argue that purportedly unentitled claiming is likely to be far more prevalent than we might think in such a practice, and that in many of these cases challenging will not be an appropriate or efficient way to respond to a claim judged not to be entitled. I develop an alternative account of how speakers might respond to unentitled assertions, by attempting to take on the perspective of the unentitled claimant, and show how the abilities required to engage in this alternative practice are already presupposed by Brandom\u2019s account of the ADP. I also show how my account provides us with insights into the development of further reasoning practices of a more or less desirable character, including abduction, rationalisation and compartmentalisation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: \u00a0 Normative inferentialist approaches to semantics in the tradition of Robert Brandom have traditionally focused on challenging as the appropriate response to an unentitled claim in an assertion-based autonomous&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_tribe_events_status":"","_tribe_events_status_reason":"","_tribe_events_is_hybrid":"","_tribe_events_is_virtual":"","_tribe_events_virtual_video_source":"","_tribe_events_virtual_embed_video":"","_tribe_events_virtual_linked_button_text":"","_tribe_events_virtual_linked_button":"","_tribe_events_virtual_show_embed_at":"","_tribe_events_virtual_show_embed_to":[],"_tribe_events_virtual_show_on_event":"","_tribe_events_virtual_show_on_views":"","_tribe_events_virtual_url":"","footnotes":""},"tags":[],"tribe_events_cat":[25],"class_list":["post-16021","tribe_events","type-tribe_events","status-publish","hentry","tribe_events_cat-metaphysics-and-logic-group","cat_metaphysics-and-logic-group"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events\/16021","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/tribe_events"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events\/16021\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16026,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events\/16021\/revisions\/16026"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16021"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16021"},{"taxonomy":"tribe_events_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events_cat?post=16021"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}