{"id":3193,"date":"2020-05-28T10:35:52","date_gmt":"2020-05-28T09:35:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/event\/metaphysics-logic-seminar-10\/"},"modified":"2020-06-16T00:43:53","modified_gmt":"2020-06-15T23:43:53","slug":"metaphysics-logic-seminar-10","status":"publish","type":"tribe_events","link":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/event\/metaphysics-logic-seminar-10\/","title":{"rendered":"Metaphysics &amp; Logic Seminar Frederick Andersen Title: An Argument Against Justification Holism in the Epistemology of Logic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>Abstract:\u00a0<\/b>E-sentences (entailment-sentences) are metalinguistic sentences like [A &#8211;&gt;\u00a0B, A\u00a0\/=\u00a0B], [\/=\u00a0\u00ac(A &amp; \u00acA)], and [(A &amp; \u00acA)\u00a0\/=\u00a0B]. This type of sentences is found at the heart of the epistemology of logic as their truth-values tell us what follows from what.\u00a0<i>Justification holism<\/i>\u00a0says that beliefs regarding E-sentences can only be justified in the context of a logical theory, e.g. classical, intuitionistic, paraconsistent etc. Thus, beliefs concerning E-sentences cannot be atomistically justified as isolated claims about logical consequence, independently of theory choice. At present there is a developing interest in and endorsement of justification holism due to the revival of a broadly abductivist approach to the epistemology of logic. This paper presents an argument against holism by proving the existence of a foundational E-sentence which is justified independently of theory choice, i.e. a justificational fixpoint of deductive entailment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract:\u00a0E-sentences (entailment-sentences) are metalinguistic sentences like [A &#8211;&gt;\u00a0B, A\u00a0\/=\u00a0B], [\/=\u00a0\u00ac(A &amp; \u00acA)], and [(A &amp; \u00acA)\u00a0\/=\u00a0B]. This type of sentences is found at the heart of the epistemology of logic&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_tribe_events_status":"","_tribe_events_status_reason":"","_tribe_events_is_hybrid":"","_tribe_events_is_virtual":"","_tribe_events_virtual_video_source":"","_tribe_events_virtual_embed_video":"","_tribe_events_virtual_linked_button_text":"","_tribe_events_virtual_linked_button":"","_tribe_events_virtual_show_embed_at":"","_tribe_events_virtual_show_embed_to":[],"_tribe_events_virtual_show_on_event":"","_tribe_events_virtual_show_on_views":"","_tribe_events_virtual_url":"","footnotes":""},"tags":[],"tribe_events_cat":[4],"class_list":["post-3193","tribe_events","type-tribe_events","status-publish","hentry","tribe_events_cat-metaphysics-reading-group","cat_metaphysics-reading-group"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events\/3193","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/tribe_events"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events\/3193\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4504,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events\/3193\/revisions\/4504"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3193"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3193"},{"taxonomy":"tribe_events_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philevents\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tribe_events_cat?post=3193"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}