GK4116 Greeks on Education
Academic year
2026 to 2027 Semester 2
Curricular information may be subject to change
Further information on which modules are specific to your programme.
Key module information
SCOTCAT credits
30
SCQF level
SCQF level 10
Availability restrictions
Available to General Degree students with the permission of the Honours Adviser
Planned timetable
TBC
Module Staff
Prof Alex Long
Module description
The debate about education in one of the most exciting periods of ancient Athenian history. Can education make you a better person? Could education make you a worse person? What form should a good education take? We shall consider how different Athenian intellectuals conceived of the challenge posed by sophistry, how they tried to distance their own teaching from sophistry, and how they looked within and beyond Athenian culture for models of good (and bad) education. We shall also examine their discussions of whether education can deliver the advantages promised by some educators and their different conceptions of the connection between education and political leadership.
Relationship to other modules
Pre-requisites
40 CREDITS FROM GK2001, GK2002 AND (GK2003, GK2004, OR GK3021, GK3022)
Assessment pattern
Written Examination = 40%, Coursework = 60%
Re-assessment
Examination = 100%
Learning and teaching methods and delivery
Weekly contact
2 hours x 11 weeks
Scheduled learning hours
22
Guided independent study hours
278
Intended learning outcomes
- Recognise characteristic features of a wide range of Greek texts from different genres that engage with debates about education
- Describe and analyse the language, contents, narrative technique, philosophical arguments and style of these works
- Analyse the interaction of these works with their social, cultural, intellectual and historical context
- Demonstrate expertise and advanced skills in translating these and related texts, seen and unseen, into good English
- Analyse, critically evaluate and discuss select pieces of published research
- Devise sophisticated and wide-ranging, coherent arguments on important research questions related to the prescribed texts on the basis of a thorough analysis of the primary text and the critical analysis of published scholarship