• CEPPA Talk Michael Huemer (University of Colorado Boulder)

    Title: Justice Before Role Obligations Abstract: Many believe that agents in the justice system are morally constrained to follow certain assigned roles, understood as excluding the exercise of moral judgement:…

  • Lara Jost – CEPPA Work-In-Progress Talk

    Title: The Labours of Chronic Illness Abstract:In this presentation, I aim to explain the three types of labour-administrative labour, hermeneutic labour and epistemic labour- that chronically ill people have to…

  • Enrico Galvagni – CEPPA Work-In-Progress Talk

    Title: Humes Account of Virtue and Its Place in the History of Ethics Abstract: Humes account of virtue is notoriously puzzling. On the one hand, he claims that the virtues…

  • CEPPA Talk Kristie Dotson (University of Michigan)

    Title:Beyond the Now:Epistemic Oppression and the Common Sense of Incarceration Abstract:In this presentation, I narrate anencounter with 2 Black teenagers who attempted to steal my cellphone and thedifficulty of insisting…

  • CEPPA Talk David Christensen (Brown University)

    Title: Epistemic Akrasia: No Apology Required Abstract: It is natural to think that rationality imposes some relationship between what a person believes, and what she believes about what shes rational…

  • CEPPA Talk Stephanie Collins (Monash University)

    Title: Legislative Intent: A Rational Unity Account (co-authored with David Tan (Deakin University)) Abstract:Does the legislature have intentions concerning the effects of legislation? If so, how can that intent be…

  • CEPPA Talk (in person) Matthew Adler (Duke University)

    Location:Edgecliffe G03 and Teams Title: Person-Affecting Consequentialism: Equity-Regarding, Desert-Neutral, Repugnant Abstract: The philosophical literature on consequentialism regularly distinguishes between person-affecting and impersonal moral justifications or accounts. The person-affecting/impersonal distinction can…

  • CEPPA Talk (in person) Brian Hedden (ANU)

    Location:School 6 Title: Counterfactual Decision Theory Abstract: I defend counterfactual decision theory, which says that you should evaluate an act in terms of which outcomes would likely obtain, were you…