Arche
Events
Calendar of Events
|
M
Monday
|
T
Tuesday
|
W
Wednesday
|
T
Thursday
|
F
Friday
|
S
Saturday
|
S
Sunday
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0 events,
|
1 event, |
0 events,
|
2 events,
-
Abstract: When a person has evidence about their capacity to assess the evidence for or against a proposition, for example, when they have evidence that their assessment is subject to bias, they have higher-order evidence. A popular view in epistemology is that higher-order evidence can make a difference to whether it is rational for a… |
0 events,
|
0 events,
|
0 events,
|
|
0 events,
|
0 events,
|
3 events,
Workshop on Identity and Individuation of Particulars and Universals
The University of 58勛圖 Arch矇 Philosophical Research Centre for Logic, Language, Metaphysics, and Epistemology will host a one-day online workshop on Identity and Individuation, which will take place on June 10th 2021, 12:30PM-7PM (British Summer Time). The aim of this workshop is to bring together and promote research in the metaphysics of identity and…
-
Abstract: Argumentation is often contrasted with testimony in that in cases of testimony, an epistemic agent (presumably) primarily evaluates the trustworthiness of the source of information (the informant), whereas in argumentation there is (presumably) primarily engagement with the content communicated. I have argued however (Dutilh Novaes 2020) that trust and trustworthiness in fact play an… |
0 events,
|
0 events,
|
||
|
0 events,
|
0 events,
|
3 events,
Workshop on Hyperintensional Metaphysics
The University of 58勛圖 Arch矇 Philosophical Research Centre for Logic, Language, Metaphysics and Epistemology will be hosting a Workshop on Hyperintensional Metaphysics, which will take place on the 17th of June 2021. The aim of this Workshop is to bring together and promote research in the area of Hyperintensional Metaphysics, and to draw connections…
-
Abstract: What is the nature of ones justification to use a logical principle such as Modus Ponens in reasoning? It is widely agreed amongst epistemologists of logic that such justification cannot be internalist. One key reason offered for this view is that internalist accounts of justification are susceptible to Carroll-style regresses. In this talk, I… |
2 events,
How Could Truth be Plural?
It has been nearly thirty years since Crispin Wrights Truth and Objectivity was published, and in these thirty years alethic pluralism has established itself as a strong contender in the current debate on truth. Yet, while various intricate versions of alethic pluralism have been developed over the years, many philosophers are still hesitant to buy… |
1 event, |
1 event, |
|
|
0 events,
|
0 events,
|
3 events,
Integrated Information Theory: Current State and Perspectives
One of the most intriguing theories of consciousness developed during the past twenty years is the Integrated Information Theory (IIT). Its core idea is that consciousness is identical with integrated information, that is, with the amount of information a system can generate as a whole, over and above the information produced by its component parts…
-
Abstract: Hinge propositions, or simply hinges, are primitive certainties that we (must) presuppose in our normal inquiries. Recently there has been a lot of interest in hinge epistemology, which is a kind of epistemology that sets the notion of hinge at the center stage. This paper puts forward a dilemma leveled against hinge epistemologists. The… |
0 events,
|
|||
|
0 events,
|
0 events,
|
2 events,
-
Abstract: Argumentation is often contrasted with testimony in that in cases of testimony, an epistemic agent (presumably) primarily evaluates the trustworthiness of the source of information (the informant), whereas in argumentation there is (presumably) primarily engagement with the content communicated. I have argued however (Dutilh Novaes 2020) that trust and trustworthiness in fact play an… |
0 events,
|
0 events,
|
0 events,
|